A silly little blog for me to drop the excrement of my mind.
Published on March 16, 2006 By BlueDev In Blogging

*Note: Le me start off by saying this is not intended as a "suck-up" article.  I hope it doesn't appear that way, it is simply a comment on an observation I recently made and thought others who blog here may find interesting.

I am sure that we have all heard about how the auto-syndication of JoeUser is a benefit to us, the bloggers.  But I wonder if we really appreciate just how much that syndication throughout the community actually accomplishes.  I know I didn't until recently. 

During the recent downtime, my itch to blog got the better of my and I established a new blog over at Blogger.  It will mainly serve as a mirror to this blog, to be used if things go down here for whatever reason.  But, of course, I wasn't getting much of any traffic.  Such is the nature of us little, random bloggers out in the wide waves of cyberspace.  And so, I availed myself of some of the tools out there to generate traffic to your blog (primarily via BlogExplosion and BlogMad).

While surfing for credits, I noticed something interesting.  There was one blog that caught my eye.  The owner was bragging about how he gets around 600 views of his blog every month.  Now, I know there are other big time blogs that get huge multiples of that.  But 600 a month is pretty decent for a no-name blogger, don't you think?

Well, I, too, am a no-name blogger.  So, I started thinking about how much traffic I get here at JU.  It is a LOT more than that.  Let's consider this month so far.  First off, we have lost quite a few days this month due to JU being down, so the following figure will probably UNDER represent the whole story.

Going off of the "Selected" figure, which I understand means that someone actually clicked on the link to go to that article, I found the following.  I have had my articles physically selected by readers 1910 times so far this month.  Almost 2000 times someone has clicked on one of my articles.  Not just randomly surfed past my site while trying to get their credits.  This doesn't even take into account the number of articles of mine that have been seen on the front page (which have been a few this month already). 

All of this without having to avail myself of any services to bring more traffic here.  This is simply a fact of the community here and auto-syndication.

Bottom line: Thanks to the JU system, we are all getting read a LOT more than is normal for "average Joe" bloggers like most of us.  A LOT more.  I found that quite fascinating actually.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 16, 2006
Fact is, for those of us who enjoy feedback on our writing, and don't want the hassle of linking our blog with this place and that, this is an ideal place to use. It's easy to set up, easy to use, and allows us the option of entering a community.

Sure, there is drama and glitches and such...but for the most part, it
is pretty good.
on Mar 16, 2006

600 visitors a month is not even REMOTELY impressive

I wasn't too impressed either, but didn't want to burst that blogger's bubble.

When I was using my little "Sitemeter" buttons in my articles (which I grew tired of and figured I had learned what I wanted to learn) I got over 34,000 views, and that was only from the beginning of December until the beginning of March.  Well over 10,000 views of my articles in not quite three month's time.

All thanks to the syndication aspect of JU.

on Mar 16, 2006
Congrats on being able to do that.


Thank You.... I can't express in words how it feels to see my essay's in any Editorial section of a paper. When an editor calls, I am humbled yet excited because his editorial team thinks I wrote a worthy piece. Mind you this is not a career endeavor, just a challenge that brings more personal enjoyment then I ever imagined. I should qualify that by saying, an even par round or sub par brings considerably more gratification.
on Mar 16, 2006
Link

This article has well over 12,000 hits, and 197 referrals. This is definitely a powerful community networking site.

Dan
on Mar 17, 2006
I've had a comprehensive literature webpage for three years and only have a total of 3800 hits. You guys are amazing. As for my stevendedalus blog I doubt over two years and 600 plus articles draw very little in replies and referrals. I feel rejected.
on Mar 17, 2006
As for my stevendedalus blog I doubt over two years and 600 plus articles draw very little in replies and referrals. I feel rejected


I post on almost all I see of yours!
on Mar 17, 2006

I've had a comprehensive literature webpage for three years and only have a total of 3800 hits. You guys are amazing. As for my stevendedalus blog I doubt over two years and 600 plus articles draw very little in replies and referrals. I feel rejected.

I read you Steven.  I just don't usually feel intelligent enough to comment!

on Mar 18, 2006
I post on almost all I see of yours!
Yes, I know, thanks. It's been fun--usually.


I read you Steven. I just don't usually feel intelligent enough to comment!
Thank you, but I don't always go deep.

2 Pages1 2