On numerous occasions (when I used to frequent game forums) I often saw it said that gaming is a privilege, not a right.
This was often pulled out when some infantile poster was whining about the price of games, that they couldn't afford the appropriate hardware, or when they talked about piracy.
In those cases, sure, I agree. Gaming isn't a right that we all should have. I don't think we should just be able to download (for free) any game we want. And people whining about not being able to afford the latest and greatest vid card etc. bug me just as much as the next person.
Unfortunately I have also seen some myopic and idiotic people on those game forums try to apply that notion of gaming being a privilege far too liberally. In particular, one of the top industry buffoons and I once engaged in a discussion on this very subject. Well, okay, we didn't really engage in a discussion. I attempted to engage the person in a discussion, and he fell back to his standard tactic of name calling, cursing, and waggling his member about trying to shut up others. But I digress.
I do believe that there comes a time when gaming is a right. And that time is when you walk out of the store, new game and receipt in hand, having compared your system specs to the printed requirements on the case. Once that transaction has occurred then, yes, I think you should consider it a right to play that game.
Some developers and publishers don't seem to agree.
They think that I should only have certain programs running on my computer. They don't think I should be allowed to have virtual drives running. They think that, even though I just used 4-5 gigabytes of my hard drive space to do what they told me was a complete install ('All game files will be installed to and run from the hard drive'), I should still have to break out the CD and insert it into my drive to play. Some of them think I should have to have an active internet connection running every time I want to start up the game, even when playing offline.
They also think that even though my system meets (and exceeds) the system requirements, I should intuitively know they really were kidding when they wrote them. They arrogantly seem to think that, even though I have legally obtained the game, actually having it work properly should only happen with the correct alignment of the stars and the planets.
Because gaming is a privilege.
Never mind the fact that those who choose to pirate the game don't have to worry about invasive copy protection. They just crack it (or get it already cracked). They don't have to keep the CD handy just to start the game up (and, yes, I know I can get a No CD crack too, I just don't think I should have to). Somehow, penalizing those who obtain the game legally seems to be the best idea. Anyone with the slightest clue knows that copy protection only deters the most lazy, ignorant, and hopeless 'pirates'.
Yet they still tread that path. And then they wonder why PC gaming is losing ground. Might this be part of the reason? Gasp!
So thanks to the developers who fight for their customers. You know, the ones who actually treat us like customers and not pirates. There aren't too many, but these days they are the ones who are going to get my business.